This site uses cookies for learning about our traffic, we store no personal details. ACCEPT COOKIES DECLINE COOKIES What are cookies?
univerge site banner
Original Article | Open Access | Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 2020; 2(1), 12-15 | doi: 10.34104/ejmhs.020012015

In-Vitro Comparative Quality Evaluation of Marketed Cefuroxime 250 mg Tablets in Bangladesh

Md. Shahin Sarker* Mail Img ,
Md. Rafiqul Islam ,
Md. Selim Reza ,
Mir Imam Ibne Wahed

Abstract

The study evaluated different quality control parameters of five brands of Cefuroxime 250mg tablets which are already marketed in Bangladesh. Five brands of the drug sourced from different retail outlets to assess the quality assessment and comparison of the tablets using the in-vitro release study. The brands were subjected to various official tests including uniformity of weight, thickness test, dissolution tests, and cumulative % of drug release and friability test.  This research further focuses on the requirement of manufacturers to construct quality into their products during manufacture and also sustain the built-in quality from batch to batch in line with the principles of cGMP.

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic resistance is one of the most common issues in the worldwide due to misuse or over use of antibiotics (Palikhe et al., 2004). According to the previous studies about 20-30% of all antibiotic use is inappropriate resulting in increased adverse effects, cost of treatment and upraises antimicrobial resistance (Steinman et al., 2003; Islam et al., 2020, and Uddin et al., 2014).  Studies reveled that, third world countries double their expenditure on drugs every four years whereas Gross Domestic Product (GDP) doubles in every sixteen years (Mohanty et al., 2010)

Beta-lactam antibiotics are one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes with numerous clinical indications. Cephalosporins are the beta-lactam antibiotics which contain a 7 amino-cephalosporanic acid nucleus and side-chain containing 3, 6-dihydro-2 H-1, 3- thiazine rings (Harding et al., 1984). Cephalosporins are divided into five classes or generations (Alam et al., 2017)

Cefuroxime is the 1-acetyloxyethyl ester of cefuroxime belongs to the second generations of cephalosporins (Harding et al., 1984). Protein binding range of cefuroxime is approximately 30% and volume of distribution of about of cefuroxime is about 171 (Foord, 1976). Distribution of cefuroxime into body fluids and tissues is variable, however, it can penetrate well (35-90%) into the tonsil tissue, sinus tissue, and bronchial mucosa (Perry et al., 1996). Adverse effects of cefuroxime are primarily gastrointestinal in nature, including diarrhea/loose stools (3.7%), nausea (2.6%), and vomiting (2.6%) (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 1995; McEvoy et al., 1997)

The primary objective of this study to evaluate the quality control parameters of Cefuroxime tablet available in the market. When tablets are manufactured, each and every tablet must have needed to comply with the standard quality but after they reach the market they may or may not maintain same quality after a certain period of time.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Chemicals and Reagents

All research grade chemical reagents (NaOH, Na2HPO4, NaHPO4 and distilled water) and logistical supports were provided by Pharmaceutical Technology Lab of the Dept. of Pharmacy, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore-7408, Bangladesh. 

Sample Collection

To perform this research study five different brands of Cefuroxime tablets were purchased from the local medicine shop of  Jashore city in Bangladesh and coded as A, B, C, D and E. All brands were labeled to contain 250 mg of cefuroxime per tablet. 

Study Design

Comparative in-vitro quality control parameters among five commercial pharmaceutical brands were studied through the evaluation of weight variation, tablets thickness, friability, and dissolution profile.

Weight Variation 

To evaluate weight variation 10 tablets of each brand were weighed individually and also weighed whole tablets   using a digital analytical electronic balance Shimadzu. This test is performed to ensure that all of the tablets in a batch are within reasonable limits of the same potency (Sarker et al., 2019). A perfect manufacturing procedure would yield a batch of tablets having identical weight and medicament content.

Thickness Test

One of the tablets from each brand was randomly selected for thickness test. In general, tablet thickness should be controlled within 5% of standard value. Tablets were individually placed horizontally between two jaws of the Vernier Calipers (Shimadzu, Japan). According to the guideline of USP (2007), tablets should have thickness about ± 5mm.

Thickness was calculated by using the following formula:

Thickness = Main scale reading + (Vernier scale reading ×Vernier constant)

Friability Test

The experiment has been started by one tablet which is considered as the initial reading. All the tablets have been placed in the drum of Friability Tester (Shimadzu, Japan) and rotate at the speed of 25rpm for 4 minutes. During this test loss of weight indicate the percent friability and the loss of weight should not more than 1% (Qiu et al., 2009).

Dissolution Test

In dissolution apparatus (Electro-lab) the water tank was filled and temperature was set at 37±0.5ºC. 900 ml of the phosphate buffer was poured into one of the vessels and instruments were run till the set temperature was attained. The remaining 100 ml of the medium was used as a blank. One of the sample tablets was placed into the vessel and starts the run. Rotate the paddle at 100 revolutions per minute. At the end of the time specified (5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min), 10 ml of the sample was collected and filtered (Sarker et al., 2018). 10 ml of the filtered sample was diluted with the buffer medium. Using the same procedure, as for the blank sample, use the phosphate buffer. Finally the absorbance was measured at 280 nm.

Statistical Analysis 

Statistical analysis regarding this research was performed by MS Office Excel and Graph Pad Prism software.

RESULTS

Weight variation test is required to determine the content uniformity of tablets. The weight variation test results of Cefuroxime 250mg is given the Table 1 which provides information about the individual % weight variation of different marketed Cefuroxime 250mg tablets. No tablets exceed ±5 % variation. Tablets of each brand were randomly selected to conduct the thickness test. Test results were given in Table 1. From the results it was obtained, that the deviation does not exceed ± 5% based on the calculation. Ten tablets each brand of Cefuroxime were selected to conduct the friability test. Test results were given in Table 1.

The dissolution studies of cefuroxime were performed in phosphate buffers (pH 4.5 and 6.8) according to US-FDA (US FDA CDER, 1997). Cumulative drug release was found 70.24%, 67.78%, 73%, 77% and 77.16% for the brands A, B, C, D and E respectively at 120 minutes.  According to previous study, cefuroxime is a BCS class II drug with poorly water solubility and by using of appropriate solubility enhancing agent (surfactant) and disintegrator can increase the dissolution rate of the active component (Woo et al., 2000).

Table 1: In-Vitro QC parameter evaluation of different brands of Cefuroxime 205mg tablets

DISCUSSION

In the present study, pharmaceutical evaluation of various brands of cefuroxime by applying different approaches to investigate quality control parameter. Drug manufacturers must have needed to ensure that their final products are consistent, safe, effective and predictable. During this study, weight variation which is the key to controlling crushing strength and friability of tablet was assessed. The test result revealed that all of the brands of cefuroxime tablets passed the weight variation uniformity test as specified in the USP (not exceed 5% deviation).

Differences between the thicknesses of the brands were found quite small. If the tablet is thicker than it cannot be swallowed by an average person, if the tablet is less thick then it can breakdown more easily. So that uniform thicknesses of all brands of any tablets is needed to ensure the quality. The friability test is designed to evaluate the ability of the tablet to withstand abrasion in packaging, handling and shipping and it is also closely related to tablet hardness. Conventional compressed tablets that lose less than 0.5 to 1 % of their weight are considered acceptable. In the friability test, the entire tablet brands showed impressive friability values.

In-vivo bioavailability of drugs, particularly for those drugs which are belonging to class II type drugs is the reflection of the dissolution profile. These drugs have low solubility and high permeability (Yuksel et al., 2000). Dissolution test results of the different marketed brand of cefuroxime tablets exerted quite impressive value. Highest cumulative drug percentage of drug release was found in Brand-E (77.16%) and lowest one was Brand-B (67%) (Israr et al., 2016). This proves that the differences among the brand is quite small so that a patient can easily choose any of the marketed brands of Cefuroxime 250mg tablets which are available in Bangladesh. 

CONCLUSION

The in-vitro physical and chemical evaluation of selected commercial brands of Cefuroxime 250mg tablets in Bangladesh passed the quality according to USP and BP requirements. As quality control parameters are related to pharmacological action of the drug, a high quality tablet should meet all the standard quality parameter for getting its proper therapeutic response. However, despite the variation most drug products are within the official limit. It reflects that these formulations definitely producing desired effects as antibiotic. So the prescribing patterns should be changed depending upon the socio-economic status of patients.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This research was logistically supported by Department of Pharmacy, Jashore University of Science and Technology (JUST), Jashore-7408, Bangladesh.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Article References:

  1. Alam SAMF., Ahmad T., Rahman S., Ray S. K., Alam M. G., Maitra P., Uddin ME. (2017). Synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives containing schiff base exhibiting antimicrobial activities,  Inter. J. of Res. Studies in Biosci., 5(7), 18-24. https://doi.org/0.20431/2349-0365.0507003 
  2. Dissolution Testing of Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); 1997. US FDA, Guidance for Industry.
  3. Foord RD. (1976.). Cefuroxime: Human pharmacokinetics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 9: 741-747.
  4. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. (1995). Cefuroxime Axetil. Package Insert. Research Triangle Park, NC: Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.
  5. Harding MS, Williams PO, Ayrton J. (1984). Pharmacology of cefuroxime as the 1-acetoxyethyl ester in volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25: 78-82.
  6. Islam R, Hossain MN, Alam MK, Uddin ME, Rony MH, Imran MAS, Alam MF,. (2020) Antibacterial Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Extraction of Bacteriocin Protein. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnol. 11(2), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2020.112004    
  7. Israr F, Mahmood ZA, Hassan F, Hasan SM. (2016). Pharmaceutical Evaluation of Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets Available in Drug Market of Pakistan. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 78(1): 17-26. doi:10.4103/0250-474x.180242. 
  8. McEvoy GK, Litvak K, Welsh OH. (1997). Cefuroxime axetil (monograph). In: American Hospital Formulary Service 1997 Drug Information. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health System Pharmacist. 173-181.
  9. Uddin ME, Maitra P, Faruquee HM, Alam MF.  (2014). Isolation and Characterization of Proteases Enzyme from Locally Isolated Bacillus sp. American J. of Life Sciences, 2(6): 338-344. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.12  
  10. Mohanty BK, Ashwini M, Hasamnis AA, Jena SK. (2010). The prescription pattern in the department of medicine of a tertiary care hospital in Rajamundry, India. J. Clin. Diag. Res. 4: 2047-51. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.01959063
  11. Palikhe N. (2004). Prescribing pattern of antibiotics in pediatric Hospital of Kathmandu Valley. J. Nepal Health Res. Council. 2(2): 31-36.
  12. Perry CM, Brogden RN. (1996). Cefuroxime axetil A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 52: 125-158.
  13. Qiu Y, Chen Y, Zhang GG, Liu L, Porter W. (2009). Editors. Developing solid oral dosage forms: pharmaceutical theory & practice. Academic press.
  14. Sarker, Md. S., Barman, R.K., Ali, Md. A., Noguchi, S., Iwao, Y., Itai, S. and Wahed, M.I.I. (2018) Formulation Development and In-Vivo Evaluation of Atorvastatin Calcium Solid Dispersion in Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Mice. Pharmacology & Pharmacy. 9, 395-414. https://doi.org/10.4236/pp.2018.99030 
  15. Sarker MS, Nahar S, and Wahed MII. (2019). In-Vitro Quality Evaluation of Marketed Naproxen500mg Tablets in Bangladesh. European J. of Medical and Health Sciences. 1(6), 59-63.
  16. Steinman MA, Gonzales R, and Landefeld CS. (2003). Changing use of antibiotics in community-based outpatient practice. Ann. Intern. Med. 138(1): 525-533.
  17. Woo JS, Chang HC. Non-Crystalline Cefuroxime Axetil Solid Dispersant, Process for Preparing Same and Composition for Oral Administration Thereof. US Patent, US 6107290. 2000.
  18. Yuksel N, Kanik AE, Baykara T. (2000). Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by ANOVA-based, model-dependent and -independent methods. Int. J. Pharm. 209: 57–67.

Article Info:

Academic Editor

Dr. Abduleziz Jemal Hamido, Deputy Managing Editor (Health Sciences), Universe Publishing Group (UniversePG), Haramaya, Ethiopia.

Received

January 7, 2020

Accepted

February 21, 2020

Published

February 29, 2020

Article DOI: 10.34104/ejmhs.020012015

Corresponding author

Md. Shahin Sarker*

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore-7408, Bangladesh

Cite this article

Sarker MS, Islam MR, Reza MS, and Wahed MII. (2020). In-vitro comparative quality evaluation of marketed cefuroxime 250 mg tablets in Bangladesh. Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 2(1), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.020012015 

Views
578
Download
1143
Citations
Badge Img
Share